3.1 Although the standard contractual forms prepared and published by the relevant bodies of the construction industry in Malaysia remain a popular choice among the parties, it should be noted that it is rare for the above standard forms to be used without any changes or modifications being made to meet the particular requirements of the client. Unless such changes are made by competent professionals, experience has shown that they have given rise to serious claims and litigation, thus “diluting” the purpose and effectiveness of the standard forms mentioned. For more details on the philosophy and origin of these forms, one can refer to the scientific article entitled The Malaysian Standard Form of Building Contract [2nd Edn].  1.2.2 Although there are other so-called standard forms that affect certain industries, for example. B petrochemicals, electricity generation, motorways, etc., or which are produced by certain employers, namely Petronas, Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB), MAB, etc., the general scope to be discussed in this document does not allow them to be dealt with in detail. The difficulties malaysia has experienced in its construction industry are not exclusive to this country. As other jurisdictions face similar problems, it will be interesting to see if other arbitration institutions follow AIAC`s lead and publish their own treaties to deal with issues in their respective regions. (iii) Types of management contracts, e.B. Contract management and construction management; CFS is presented as a common tool used by the parties to improve efficiency and minimize legal and transactional costs. However, parties quickly realize that they may need to significantly modify their CFS in certain situations, particularly for high-value projects where a “standard approach” is not always the best.
1.3.3 More recently, the Construction Industry Development Council (CIDB) has developed and published its own standard form for construction services (carried out as part of traditional general entrepreneurship) in the style of the “CIDB Standard Form of Contract For Building Works: 2000 Edition”. A standard form for the designated subcontract was also published. It is not yet clear whether there are more standard forms to be issued by the ICDB. While it may seem that the CIDB`s intention is to generalize the use of its forms, the question of whether these CIDB standard forms will ultimately replace the existing JKR standard forms at the moment does not lead to an accurate answer, at least. In Malaysia, standard contractual forms, which are mainly formulated and published by the relevant industry authorities and recognized by the contracting parties, are among the most popular standard forms of contracts used among industry leaders. Article 26 of the SC deals in the same way with mediation with regard to matters relating to the performance of subcontracted construction services, whether it is a contract or an offence. CFS are ready-to-use contracts consisting of common clauses such as payment, variations, damages for delay and extensions of time, and contain “standard” clauses. They seek to streamline efforts to conclude and sign contracts – especially to avoid significant negotiations between the parties – as they leave room only for important information from the parties such as signatures, dates and names. (iii) contracts concluded through the traditional general contractor supply chain (TGC). What are supposed to be standard terms can be used so rarely compared to other terms that they cannot realistically be considered standard, or on any given occasion they can be added or mutilated in such a way that it must be assumed that they have lost their essential identity. For the Terms to be standard, they must be considered its terms and conditions by the party presenting them and that it must usually enter into contracts in these Terms. If it also concludes other contracts, it must be determined on a case-by-case basis whether this has happened so frequently that the terms in question cannot be regarded as standard, and whether a party has substantially modified its conditions prepared on each occasion, it is in fact a question of whether those conditions have been modified in such a way that it can be assumed that: that they have not been applied in this way.
Opportunity. Here are some of the main types of international/foreign standard contract forms used in Malaysia: 2.2.9 Below is a brief guide to understanding the contractual context in which the engineer operates in Malaysia under a FIDIC contract: One of Dr Mahathir`s early reforms included a detailed study of megaprojects awarded overseas. Earlier this year, a working group led by Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali (Minister of Economy) was set up to review these projects and ensure that future processes are transparent. I can`t really comment on the CIDB, but I accept that they don`t promote their standard form as much as they could. It`s usually the industry that drags its feet because it doesn`t like change, good or bad. I believe that once the CIPA law is passed, the standard forms will change accordingly and the cidb standard form will be more relevant. While in Malaysia, standard forms still make up the majority of all engineering/construction contracts awarded, large employers increasingly prefer to use modified or ad hoc forms. The latter also appear to be gaining momentum in the areas of subcontracting and delivery of equipment, perhaps due to the fact that standard forms for these categories of contracts are not available at the local level. 3.1.2 Some employers or industry sectors may prefer not to use one of the standard forms above, even with changes or modifications, but may prefer to design them from their own point of view. These are commonly referred to as “tailor-made” or “ad hoc” or “custom-made” or even “tailor-made” forms of contractual conditions. Examples of such “tailor-made” contractual terms include the “Putrajaya” form, the “KLCC” form, the “KLSSB” form and the “KLIA” form.
In the Malaysian context, FIDIC forms are used in some cases, especially when: to date, JKR does not have standard forms for the other types of contracts discussed above, e.B. turnkey national contracts, management contracts, construction management contracts, serial contracts, continuation contracts, etc. Judging by the current trend towards privatization of other projects, it is doubtful that JKR will create/publish such standard forms in the future. “I agree that if a party enters into contracts without exception under the same written terms without significant deviations, those terms will become their `standard contract` or `standard written terms and conditions`. However, it does not follow that, since terms are not used without exception or without significant deviations, they cannot be standard terms. The engineer assumes the role of certifier when extending a time limit, including the dates on which certain parts of the work must be completed and when assessing deviations from the contract or design specifications.  The fact that the consulting engineer is the employer`s representative is not easy to challenge. The engineer is rightly considered the employer`s representative for a variety of reasons.
First, the work done by the engineer is done in the interest and taking into account the employer`s objectives. With the appointment of the contractor, certain obligations are also transferred to the employer. These tasks require some familiarity with the design philosophy of the works and the engineer performs them best. .